This is one of Time Magazine’s upcoming covers. It is obviously meant for shock and awe. Yes, I am comparing it to war because women are VERY mean and love to rip each other up over their parenting and mothering choices.
full disclosure: we have nursed all of our children through age 5. Maybe even a little longer. We also share a bed with our children, we wore slings, and yes, we even birthed them at home. None of that is probably surprising, but just so you know. And those are our choices and those that know our children know there is nothing insecure about them…
But back to the photo. The shock and awe. I don’t think breastfeeding or co-sleeping or babywearing or even Dr. Sears will be what sticks with this story. I think it will be the parents who are mortified their children can see such a thing. Meanwhile, on the cover of the magazine next to this one will be things such magazine covers with scantily clad women in permiscuous poses and such headlines as “Bring your partner to orgasm quickly” and “why teens want sex now rather than later” and “which drugs are best for your libido” and “lose ten pounds fast.”
And those are deemed acceptable.
If my 12 year old son walks into a convenience store on the “good” side of town to get a Gatorade after baseball practice he can clearly see the front covers of Hustler, Playboy, and American Male. Clearly. Would this be acceptable if it were an adult male finding comfort in his wife’s breast? But a child finding comfort in his mom’s breast is unacceptable.
My facebook “friends” will not bother me nor challenge me, I don’t think, because they know how I feel. I am a nipple nazi. I am mom enough. And frankly, I don’t care if they are mom enough or not.
Unless my tax money is buying their formula or my tax money is paying their child’s medical bills because that child was deprived of what is his – breastmilk. Don’t take money from me and then do all you want. Take my money and I will call you out.


Rock ON Nipple Nazi mama! It’s time that these images become the norm, and readily accepted. Public breast feeding without shame or fear should also be normal. Having women’s bodies be so sexualized is incredibly tiresome…it’s time to take back the practicality of our bodies.
I can see where the picture was meant to shock. However, I simply do not like the picture. I do not think it accomplishes what the breastfeeding movement would want it too. Well maybe it does. I am not really involved in that…. However the mom looks pretty disconnected and so does the boy. It kinda looks like “Ugh, just got back from Yoga and the kid wants to feed. Climb up while I stand here” Maybe I have a romantic view of breastfeeding, even if it is an older child. I envision a couch, bed, chair,holding, cuddling, something more intimate. But I am sure not all feedings happen like that so maybe it just shows that. I do not know. I just simply do not like the pic. I think it could have been done a lot better.
I actually agree about the photo itself. On the original posting I saw (groceryalerts.ca Facebook page) I commented that I believe the picture is not meant to lift up breastfeeding or attachment parenting, but to mock it. And it will. My point with the photo is rather about the stir it will cause as compared to all the other magazine covers.
And you are correct, she looks disconnected. It’s definitely a cuddle thing in this house!
Agree, I think it’s more about the shock value. I looked at the photo as- Mom trying to do it all- “super mom.” I don’t care if the child is not gazing into his mother’s eyes. Instead of the photo mocking, it’s empowering! I don’t see it as focusing on the nipple…Yes, she can do it all, clean, prepare dinner, and breastfeed all at the same time.
[...] me to a straightforward, clean (as in not a lot of distracting visual stuff and preferably no 3 year old’s nursing) site with NO video. Just a line-by-line. Please. Because I have no clue. I find it to be so [...]